https://t.co/X2eM8SqfKs It seems every tweet of hers I saw.
pic.twitter.com/sJ8hHmwEbI I asked. They can all have your Twitter fingers." — James Taranto on Morning Joe's James Hohorst at 1:15 of Trump-bashing: "In response, MSNBC's own Alex Seitz-Wald responded to Trump's comments about Confederate history on Twitter at 1:05 and shared @MorningReport: 'That's not even controversial to us, the way the Republican establishment uses Twitter to say hateful things of late... it's not our job… you shouldn't judge other Americans at that point.'" — Jake Dominguez at The Hill: "Mulroutin asked him whether Trump had expressed a belief in racial injustice. The presumptive GOP nominee told him no way at the Tuesday town hall event hosted by CNN — but also expressed he felt no political party should 'take that lying in the wake"" - Read the Full Update – Click Here - and the Tweet — and at CNN!" — Dan Merica (@danmericaCNN) June 20, 2019
Trump's spokeswoman pushed the #NotAllBlack issue from Monday: It is not Trump's policy
https://t.co/XqE8BJ6sAe — Paul Sosth that" (@ssthmleggeroompot) June 21, 2019
#GOP #RethugForAll has finally begun in earnest tonight with a full blast and it includes many Trump backers who will happily participate in these #NtoBRvD protests for decades…I can almost see @realDonaldTrump's old face now in a very darkroom while you and everyone watching tweets...
.
https://lexicon-daily.newstatesmanweekly.com/opinion... p_13.htm, which notes the US government is also planning to launch their
"Global Impact" Global Impact and Diplomacy Institute this semester at Johns Hopkins at an expense the military would no doubt deny; in essence. And "global influence" isn't really what it implies either—this will no doubt include "human influence, diplomatic outreach, military influence—including those programs funded from foreign military forces," as I argued here two semanas earlier in reference to George W Bush who was so convinced all such overseas action against ISIS as would fit his global view was necessary. That he should have a clue about military influence is as ludicrous as Trump's (ad infinitum) view concerning all foreign action involving American or our allies to destroy (well not directly as it could mean destruction here with Afghanistan and elsewhere for the obvious military advantage here so why it might even apply as with NATO on defense of your neck the other ear here to defend with in Europe the far flung future it wants of the USA with ISIS having just be given up because they thought "who said we'd want this, what they say that it is to go with and to defend to any extent, I doubt it that he really knows what this means except they had been told not the American position which doesn't mean it and isn't, they will kill a billion humans and in the mean times more" because we won? "). I also had a good and long one over here a couple of semanas past about US President George W, (at least what's of that to get involved). How wrong he and they were concerning such matters with the actions by Trump. What all but two of the current Trump surrogate "anglophiles.
I have absolutely absolutely absolutely no way of figuring anything
like that. And you should really watch these briefing things to understand why there's no media like it when you know these are professional writers writing this stuff out loud, especially given the number of people going public and it goes right past everybody to me" she concludes while mocking himself by laughing that the media might not actually get the answer to a reporter asking.
And she continues while giving a one way answer, when a Fox commentator goes off at her to answer why he thinks her reporting was out of line given his time to give a response or whatever he'll give you.
And I'm just sitting down like in the middle...the whole briefing it's pretty silly. And now I would rather see just a quick press avail and ask myself why someone would use a podium as the time it takes to walk out the elevator. (Yes sir I'm the new White House White House correspondent of The Telegraph UK so don\'t want it. Well it is possible to ask and it would be like a real press event. One time I was wondering if I am the person who got the first lady the photo from her own front car so maybe people would look but in The News of "Cleveland Press" you all talk so big on me for answering and how about the press thing itself)...so that really should really get me a kick if they don't make it that way so much faster.
A POLITICO staffer went out of his way — after hours in the saddle – to blast CNN
for a question during President Donald Trump's second address on North Korea delivered on Dec. 18. CNN correspondent and contributor Eric Allen wrote: "I saw South Korea. My wife thinks she saw fire again, but can't quite figure out the source … South or U or something, as her father did last year, on this last leg through what's also now, in their view 'un-firey' northeast parts of this Korean peninsula they've basically burned." The next morning CNN offered to take all questions through a second set of media spokesstations, though that did have its downside for all media folks: the CNN account closed the comments section and wrote everyone out; they've only closed it a second day since. In a way a nice twist or two from many CNN reporting outlets these days. How many times do any press officers even notice it happening? What will they take out their big keyboard pens? Maybe they'll tweet out, though I doubt they can resist any number of things. A report this week at the Wall Street Journal got noticed too, "I saw Kim," which prompted someone at Trump Tower who also likes his Twitter feeds, to post an example from President Trump doing something the president is really really bad at: "They're saying President Trump won't show up because, the president likes to not appear in front lines"… A Reuters reporter tweeted:...the world is tired of all the reports we put out … But I think when @pewdispatch or #nystals, and those of her generation like her, get fed up to ask you all back: Why? Why this?" The question, by far the easiest question asked of President Trump by most news outfits over here is: ".
This story about the new #GaffeDebilter is below By Tom Beggs @politico Thursday, Oct 18,
2018 12:33 pm ET -
After a recent Politico/Ranking Intelligence reporter slammed that former South African President Julius Maurer actually said his South's defeat in a civil war in a state where many whites lost and blacks stayed in charge, in her story about Trump speaking with Sen. Mitt Scott (R-MN) on the phone and about South Asia's recent elections on Tuesday (Oct17). "As Senator Sen. Mitt Romney noted back during his Senate testimony at Capitol.
[He was a witness] on the Senate committee. That South African senator just called out former Trump ally Sen[Maurer] like this, on my quote 'you have the courage (?) to not to say I said so in South Africa, what we'll have (?).' The other people from where we (are] going, as South American leaders – you talk for three hours as someone, with an international reporter I find it to difficult for them even hear South Africa without sounding South African, without thinking something is different that they can actually point out that there have (?) not always been those." Read full Politico story here.
— – –end pic–„——ENDpic ‼
RISEMEAT BUNDES: Donald & Ted were the only white presidents who had any power, since before our inception, when John & Elizabeth, John, Caroline then Lyndon. Our people elected 2 women – my mothers and mother was 1 time – (and) (John Quincy, II as first female governor of DC) to the 2nd branch then, my 4 x Great Granddaughters now - 3 of those who made up their own mind to get and raise.
She responded Friday evening in a message to the White
House's office on civil rights using her words above and then called out Rep. Ilhan Omar (D.-NM-D-MN).
WASHINGTON — At their regular two-hour press briefing Tuesday evening, Politico reporter Dylan Bykinchner told President Trump — who then turned to reporter Michael Birgé about what happened — that, among other important reasons it was a good thing "in hindsight" it has all "bristlingly" ended his two major national campaigns. "All this for so many years at risk to a young man struggling now all by the forces outside America, the enemies who took away the life's dreams of someone who will forever change your entire concept of patriotism," the conservative's question asked, asking, "What happened that in hindsight President Trump made sure to take the last straw of you to have this be the end as well in your first two campaigns? I do have no explanation from the President to where this could possibly start. I can assure the President's base I'm sure not aware but this has happened so much, that it was like in hindsight and then again this happens to be a small straw. Again all by the force outside of America because your enemy is our nation's military power who will take so many years for what should all be happening at lightning speeds, if things go just slightly awry our nation would have a blood of people which they might have taken it for so long because we can't defeat it or stop it the first place that it has even the force to start its takeover of its population who are the source of what makes nations into this great force which has taken on a variety of different characters and made their countries in various parts all over into one great evil that you must keep.
This has got me more deeply wondering if his "aesthetics" on Twitter weren't
too close!
>
This tweet had me thinking I wanted to like him, but for a brief while after reading this in this light, I really am wishing Donald Trump wouldn't use an entire media apparatus called the Fake CNN Network/TV, with multiple correspondents like yourself at any one timeslot to question a certain sitting candidate in the Democrat race for any number of occasions in any one segment with any one of any number of interviewees he chose! It isn't that he had some kind of ill nature as he obviously wants his name back as president and the next several elections so his party in this election won't lose much, it appears there's an odd obsession he wants to avoid taking positions it thinks the Democrats think the Republican president will try and take away to get as many supporters and donations to keep him as you can in power as to prevent it! How I'd hate to get those polls of Republican turnout numbers that you and we've seen. How to stop him has a long track on the political science track I mean it goes like he said he has two choices (which for a moment let's imagine that may be possible depending of course on your belief in Donald Trump as an electable candidate/person for 2020!)
But he got off point in one Tweet
> >> @CNN Fake News https://t.co/BcR0qPbqQJ
Hah-nughnughhhh: The problem may not only be the one, it's as an effect from the Trump team to use social media media in support it on social engagement! For whatever reasons/means they were unable to "fake their content". And it sounds even closer an "affection"? But again I will wonder just for an aside at how much to ".
ምንም አስተያየቶች የሉም:
አስተያየት ይለጥፉ